BEWARE THE WHITE ARAB

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

  الإخوان المسلمين السلام_عليكم

Sisters, beware of the white Arab. They want our honey and they use that “Arab Money” to try and get it.

They use the Superior Knowledge of Islam over your Christianity, which teaches that we make the best babies. YOU just don’t know it. So you fall for it. Look at Janet.

Went and made a speckled up baby with a white Arab when she had the BEST MAN IN THE UNIVERSE – THE ASIATIC BLACK MAN.

If her husband was a true MUSLIM, SHE WOULD NOT BE WORKING.

Those Arabs, MUSLIM or otherwise, just want to use us. And, they cannot teach you Islam. Their Islam is outdated. And, should rightfully be called “HISLAM.”

If you want to learn ISLAM, learn it from your own BLACKMAN IN AMERICA.

CLICK THE PICTURE AND READ THIS BOOK
BELIEVE AND PRACTICE IT!!!

message-to-the-blackman

Save yourself, BLACKWOMAN and your liquid gold (HONEY) FOR YOUR OWN BLACKMAN, UP FROM SLAVERY IN THE U.S., JUST LIKE WE ARE.

WE ARE THE SUPREME BEINGS OF THE UNIVERSE. LET US VALUE OUR HONEY LIKE THEY DO, AND KEEP IT WITHIN THE “B” (BLACK PEOPLES) HIVE. 

SINGLE-PARENT HOUSEHOLDS

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Image result for as salaamu alaikum in arabic

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Dearly Beloved Sisters and Brothers
of the Asiatic Black Nation of Islam!!!

I have read that a Black child had a greater chance of growing up with both parents during SLAVERY than he has nowadays. This is terrible. The only solution is Islam as taught by The Most Honourable and Humble Elijah Muhammad (May the Peace and the Blessings of Allah forever be upon him). You can read our Holy Scripture by clicking here.

Sexual Immorality has gotten way out of control and has resulted in much too many single parent households. The root of the problem is Christianity built upon greed and laziness which leads to whoremongoring (prostitution).

We must also stop having premarital and extra-marital affairs for ourselves, our children, Allah’s and our Holy Black Nation of Islam’s sake.

Both must first love Allah, then each other, marry in a lawful manner and then we will be better prepared to face life together and our children will be better qualified to build A Strong and Progressive Asiatic Black Nation of Islam.

34f944eb6ccb7c332d059fb23c510418--august-nd-poor-children (1)

WADOODAHTUNE

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

Image result for white roses

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for white roses

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for GARDENIAS

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for GARDENIAS

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for magnolia

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for daisies

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for WHITE TULIPS

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Image result for WHITE CALLA LILIES

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

 

FLOWERS, CARDS & CANDY

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Image result for black man giving flowers

السلام عليكم

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Dearly Beloved Asiatic Black Brothers & Sisters

This is for the girls who are being courted and you brothers who are courting them…

Apparently this subject is extremely relevant due to the fact that it keeps resurfacing. Thus, the blog…

I must give it from the M.G.T. perspective as it is SUPREME.

A Brother once told me that they were not allowed to give the Sister they were courting money. At the time I disagreed. Now, I see the Wisdom.

The object of courting is MARRIAGE.

Marriages only work when they are built on ISLAMIC principles. Both must be followers of THE MOST HONOURABLE AND HUMBLE ELIJAH MUHAMMAD (May the Peace and the Blessings of Allah forever be upon him.)

The Brother MUST initiate the process, in order for the relationship to be built on a firm foundation. He is not to approach the Sister himself. He should ask his friend (ideally his Captain) to ask her friend (ideally her Captain) to let the Sister know he thinks she would make a good wife and would like to enter into a Courtship with her.

Then, the only decent and intelligent gifts he should give and she should accept are flowers, cards and candy ONLY.

Image result for roses

The idea is to romance her, right?

Remember, ALL DATES ARE CHAPERONED. YOU ARE NEVER ALONE!!!

So, if he plans a date in the Bahamas, you must refuse because we are also instructed to keep our engagements short!

If he gives you a credit card/cash, that’s like telling you I don’t need you. I just want you to need me. So, here’s some money to get you dependent on me. Then I can exploit you.

If he gives you a car, that’s like telling you you don’t need me. So, just take this car and go on and do whatever you want to do. Go somewhere else.

If he gives you jewelry, that’s like telling you I want everybody else to look at you and want you. That is equivalent to grooming you to be a prostitute. Muslim women don’t go out with the intention of attracting attention. We are completely opposite to Western women, whose primary objective is to attract attention. Muslim women are modest when we go out in the public. We cover ourselves from head to toe to PREVENT strange men from lusting after us. We wear our refinery at home for our husband’s eyes only.

Image result for roses

The bottom line is, if you have HIM, YOU DON’T NEED ANY OF THOSE THINGS.

When he proposes, then you get the choice to accept him and the jewelry, cash, clothes, trips and cars (I still wouldn’t take the car. I don’t want to go anywhere without my husband.)

Brothers, diamonds are forever. Which is why they are the only acceptable type of ring to seal a marriage. You don’t need a ring to be my wife. Is unacceptable. You BOTH need rings to be official. It is Allah’s way of telling the world that you are each off the market. Even if YOU don’t think you need one, the people you come in contact with need to know.

Your wife needs TWO rings. The engagement ring MUST have a diamond, preferably a solitaire, to symbolize your undying love and attraction to each other. It’s like you stay engaged forever so the love never grows old.

The wedding band goes after the engagement ring to keep it in place and to show that your cipher is complete and neverending.

Image result for chocolate

Sister, beware of Brothers who attempt to give you jewelry, clothes, cash, cars, expensive trips. These things appeal to GREED not LOVE. He will pimp you. Beware of terms of endearment, if it’s not personalized. He could be calling seven different women Baby, to keep from getting your names mixed up.

The idea is ROMANCE. Is there anything romantic about money? NO, it is vulgar and insensitive. You want something thoughtful that is personalized specifically toward you from him.

Brothers, put some thought into your courtship gifts. Always, write a personalized message to augment any pre-printed cards you give. Or skip the card and write her a Love Letter. 🙂 But don’t offend her.

Books are good too.  Sisters you can gauge his intelligence and ideology by the type of books he reads. It also gives you something to discuss.

Is there anything romantic about clothes? No, it’s impersonal and pushy. Accessories included. I’m offended just thinking about it.

Image result for love notes

I remember the love notes I used to get. Love letters are important because it’s putting your feelings on paper. You know? Making them concrete. I can recognize his handwriting and he can recognize mine because of love letters we wrote each other over thirty years ago. He wrote the track listing on a c.d. and I saw it and fell in love all over again. Just from the sight of his penmanship. ❤ ❤ ❤

Teach your children how to write in cursive, PLEASE. Taking handwriting out of school curriculum was the wickedest thing this country could have ever done to our children. It is one of the best ways to express your individuality and creativity. I know it’s because of this piece of steel and magnets I’m writing on now.

Brothers, don’t give the Sister cash/plastic or anything that can be returned for cash or plastic because I know how greedy some women can be.

I am living in the South for the first time in my life and was enthralled the first time I saw a field of wildflowers.  You know I picked some. They were new and exotic and beautiful. A gift of a bouquet of wildflowers from your heart would be a nice touch and every time she sees them in the future she will think of you.

LOVE YOURSELF. ❤

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VICTORY OF THE APOSTLE

BISMILLAHI RAHMANI RAHIM

DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE COLORADO BAKER WHO WON HIS SUPREME COURT BATTLE AGAINST THE SODOMITIC HOMOSEXUALS!

BUSINESSES CAN LEGALLY REFUSE SERVICE TO HOMOSEXUALS!!!

ALLAHU AKBAR!!

NEW YORK TIMES

In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Gay Couple

Image
Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, leaving the Supreme Court in December. The court said on Monday that a Colorado panel’s decision against him had been infected by religious animus.CreditZach Gibson for The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to create a wedding cake for a gay couple. The court’s decision was narrow, and it left open the larger question of whether a business can discriminate against gay men and lesbians based on rights protected by the First Amendment.

The court passed on an opportunity to either bolster the right to same-sex marriage or explain how far the government can go in regulating businesses run on religious principles. Instead, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s majority opinion turned on the argument that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which originally ruled against the baker, had been shown to be hostile to religion because of the remarks of one of its members.

At the same time, Justice Kennedy strongly reaffirmed protections for gay rights.

“The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts,” he wrote, “all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market.”

Justice Kennedy often casts the deciding vote in closely divided cases on major social issues. When the court agreed to hear the Colorado case last June, it seemed to present him with a stark choice between two of his core commitments. On the one hand, Justice Kennedy has written every major Supreme Court decision protecting gay men and lesbians. On the other, he is the court’s most ardent defender of free speech.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Monday, Justice Kennedy chose a third path, one that seemed to apply only to the case before the court.

Writing for the majority in the 7-to-2 decision, he said the Civil Rights Commission’s ruling against the baker, Jack Phillips, had been infected by religious animus. He cited what he said were “inappropriate and dismissive comments” from one commissioner in saying that the panel had acted inappropriately and that its decision should be overturned.

You have 4 free articles remaining.

Subscribe to The Times

“The neutral and respectful consideration to which Phillips was entitled was compromised here,” Justice Kennedy wrote. “The Civil Rights Commission’s treatment of his case has some elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs that motivated his objection.”

That passage echoed his plea for tolerance in his majority opinion in 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges, which recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. In that decision, he called for “an open and searching debate” between those who opposed same-sex marriage on religious grounds and those who considered such unions “proper or indeed essential.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When the Colorado case was argued in December, Justice Kennedy seemed frustrated with the main choices available to him and hinted that he was looking for an off ramp. His questions suggested that his vote had not been among the four that had been needed to add the case to the court’s docket.

Video

00:00
2:09

Jack Phillips explains his reasons for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.Published OnCreditImage by Matthew Staver for The New York Times

The breadth of the court’s majority was a testament to the narrowness of the decision’s reasoning. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Elena Kagan and Neil M. Gorsuch joined Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas voted with the majority but would have adopted broader reasons.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented.

The case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, No. 16-111, arose from a brief encounter in 2012, when David Mullins and Charlie Craig visited Mr. Phillips’s bakery, Masterpiece Cakeshop, in Lakewood, Colo. The two men were going to be married in Massachusetts, and they were looking for a wedding cake for a reception in Colorado.

Mr. Phillips turned them down, saying he would not use his talents to convey a message of support for same-sex marriage at odds with his religious faith. Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig said they were humiliated by Mr. Phillips’s refusal to serve them, and they filed a complaint with Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission, saying that Mr. Phillips had violated a state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig won before the commission and in the state courts.

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Phillips’s free speech rights had not been violated, noting that the couple had not discussed the cake’s design before Mr. Phillips turned them down. The court added that people seeing the cake would not understand Mr. Phillips to be making a statement and that he remained free to say what he liked about same-sex marriage in other settings.

Though the case was mostly litigated on free speech grounds, Justice Kennedy’s opinion barely discussed the issue. Instead, he focused on what he said were flaws in the proceedings before the commission. Members of the panel, he wrote, had acted with “clear and impermissible hostility” to sincerely held religious beliefs.

One commissioner in particular, Justice Kennedy wrote, had crossed the line in saying that “freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Justice Kennedy wrote that “this sentiment is inappropriate for a commission charged with the solemn responsibility of fair and neutral enforcement of Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.”

In dissent, Justice Ginsburg said that a few stray remarks were not enough to justify a ruling in Mr. Phillips’s favor.

“What prejudice infected the determinations of the adjudicators in the case before and after the commission?” Justice Ginsburg asked. “The court does not say.”

Justice Kennedy wrote that the commission had also acted inconsistently in cases involving an opponent of same-sex marriage, “concluding on at least three occasions that a baker acted lawfully in declining to create cakes with decorations that demeaned gay persons or gay marriages.”

Image
Protesters outside the Supreme Court after the ruling, which one gay rights group said “offered dangerous encouragement to those who would deny civil rights to L.G.B.T. people.”CreditTom Brenner/The New York Times

In dueling concurring opinions, two sets of justices debated how central that last observation was to the court’s decision. Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Breyer, said such differing treatment could be justified. Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Alito, disagreed, saying that “the two cases share all legally salient features.”

In another concurring opinion, Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, said he would have ruled in favor of Mr. Phillips on free speech grounds. Mr. Phillips’s cakes are artistic expression worthy of First Amendment protection, Justice Thomas wrote, and requiring him to endorse marriages at odds with his faith violated his constitutional rights.

ADVERTISEMENT

In dissent, Justice Ginsburg disagreed with that analysis and noted that the majority had not adopted it. She wrote that there was no reason to think that people seeing a wedding cake made by Mr. Phillips would understand it to be conveying his views on same-sex marriage.

Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Mr. Phillips, said the ruling was a victory for religious liberty.

“Government hostility toward people of faith has no place in our society, yet the State of Colorado was openly antagonistic toward Jack’s religious beliefs about marriage,” said Kristen Waggoner, a lawyer with the group. “The court was right to condemn that. Tolerance and respect for good-faith differences of opinion are essential in a society like ours.”

The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig, said it welcomed the parts of the majority opinion that reaffirmed legal protections for gay men and lesbians.

“The court reversed the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision based on concerns unique to the case but reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace, including against L.G.B.T. people,” said Louise Melling, the group’s deputy legal director.

Some gay rights groups took a darker view of the decision. “The court today has offered dangerous encouragement to those who would deny civil rights to L.G.B.T. people,” said Rachel B. Tiven, the chief executive of Lambda Legal. “We will fiercely resist the coming effort that will seek to turn this ruling into a broad license to discriminate.”

Even as she dissented, Justice Ginsburg wrote that “there is much in the court’s opinion with which I agree,” quoting several passages reaffirming gay rights protections.

“Colorado law,” Justice Kennedy wrote in one, “can protect gay persons, just as it can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.”

Follow Adam Liptak on Twitter: @adamliptak.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Justices Favor Baker in Case On Gay Rights. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

 

NEW ORLEANS MUSIC TOUR

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Related image

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Beloved Brothers and Sisters!

Yesterday, I finally had the opportunity to take the New Orleans Music Tour. I first saw a flier in 2015, the first time I came here, if I’m not mistaken. In any case, the tickets were $25, which I didn’t have or couldn’t spare.

The New Orleans Public Library listed the tour as one of the Summer events. At the time, I didn’t know it was the same tour, but anything beginning with New Orleans Music is a sure shot for Love. 🙂

It rained in the early part of the day and I toyed with the idea of skipping the tour. I’m so L.A., and we’re very laid back. So, even though I really wanted to go and had been wanting to go for quite some time, it wasn’t a big deal if I got rained out.

But the rain stopped. It was still cloudy though and appeared as if any minute the Heavens might pour rain down on us yet again. But, nevertheless, I found myself packing up my sewing project, and tidying up, in preparation for an excursion.

I arrived at the meeting place – a bar on the perimeter of The French Quarter and a couple of people were outside probably of my same mind which under no circumstances would find me entering such an establishment.

They confirmed that they too, were amongst the group of musical tourists and pointed me in the direction of the ticket office in a space adjoining the rear of the bar.

As I approached, a trio of people, who clearly worked at the Library (Library personnel tend towards eccentricity) exited the ticket office, one clad with a clipboard, preparing to check off our names.

We had to Répondez S’il Vous Plaît. She checked us off one by one and noted that a majority of potential tourists opted to stay home – most likely due to the inclement weather.

Shortly thereafter, a chubby, bubbly little Sister also emerged from the office, introduced herself and invited us in for wristbands and fans.

I have been needing a fan for awhile now. I had one in L.A., as usual, but it broke before I arrived in New Orleans.

It was so ironic for me because a matching parasol and fan were a part of all of my garments and upon arriving in New Orleans I found that they are very commonplace here, whereas in L.A., I was pretty much the forerunner in that style, at least of late. It’s classic.

In the eighteen hundreds up until the 1950s, women (and men) would not think of leaving the house without some type of head covering and gloves. They protect us from the filth of this world. Add the tambourine, the parasol (or para agua) and the fan and the sum is me and New Orleans.

So, as we began the music tour, our guide carried with her a bluetooth speaker, playing music that punctuated her spiel.

She began with

Mrs. Irma Thomas – The Soul Queen of New Orleans.

Related image

I’ve never been able to afford to see her here in Nawlins, although I recently found out that she does an annual concert for Mother’s Day at one of the more well-known recreation parks and I’m pretty sure that’s free.

I was privileged to catch her act last Summer at the Santa Monica Pier Twilight Concert Series and I can say, with the exception of some of her more raunchier stuff, that I really liked her, even more so than The Queen of Soul.

We crossed “The Ramp” (Rampart Street), officially exiting The French Quarter and entering The Treme. The tour took place on a Sunday afternoon, just as the Congo Square Drum Circle was in full swing.

I felt like the biggest hypocrite because I have actually come to blows and ended up in jail over these tours and here I am on one, in the very same place.

So, when I recognized some faces in The Drum Circle I accepted their looks of contempt as something I should have expected.

I was the only so-called Negro on the tour. Our guide, was of course, Black, but she informed me later that her father was a Jew. Hence her name Malika “Goldberg,” or something equally as ludicrous.

We talked about the history of the Drum Circle, our guide swooning over it, as most people who are heavily into music do. She related the history of The Treme’ as the oldest Black neighborhood in America and the location where we were standing our ancestors (mine and hers anyway :/ ) had been gathering in the exact same location on the same day, at the same time for about the last three hundred (300) years.

She omitted the fact that we were only corralled there in the Square, while the white devil slavemasters cavorted in The Quarter…

Moving on, she spoke at length about the famous Mardi Gras Indian Chief “Tootie” Montana. I didn’t tell her how we Black New Orleanians pronounce his name. Nor what, Black New Orleans musicians call Satchmo, about whom she talked later. I’m not telling you either, because I called 2pac by his familiar name one time on FB, now er’body and they momma calling him by it. So cheah.

She talked about the trumpet jazz pioneer, Buddy Bolden, whose statue up until that time, I had thought was Louis Armstrong. They may have just changed the plaque. White people do that kind of deceptive stuff.

Image result for statue in louis armstrong park

She talked about Satchmo, for whom the park is named, as we stood in front of his twelve-foot-high or so statue.

She talked at length about Mahalia Jackson, whose statue is about as tall as Armstrong’s.

But she could barely even recall Sidney Bechet’s name, much less mention he has a bust sculpture. He wasn’t a part of the tour. :/ But feel free to wave as we walk right on by him.

Image result for sidney bechet bust armstrong park

I was stunned. And, later when I went back (I left the tour early. I refuse to be humiliated while you sing the “praises” of the Catholic Church that still enslaves our Black people today! I’m not going to use your favorite term which is like poison every time it is uttered.

Why say, “Free People of Colour” instead of BLACK? Is there any other colour of people whose coulour necessitates the prefix of “FREE?” Is there a need to preamble Mexican, or Japanese, Chinese, Indian or even Native American with the emotionally charged precursor of the word “FREE?” I think not.

So, why insult my intelligence by inferring that there’s any other colour of people included in that descriptive terminology of yours, other than the American So-Called Negroes, and just call a Black Spade –  Black!

WE ARE BLACK AND PROUD. SO, SAY IT LOUD! BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK!

And, stop worrying about and fearing your devil Caucasian white slavemaster, who is actually afraid of us and the power that will result from our UNITY under the all-encompassing word that applies only to the Chosen People of Allah (God) and not any other race of people – BLACK!

Image result for statue in louis armstrong park

Back to Sidney and his snub. Now, keep in mind that every last person mentioned on this tour is

A. A native of New Orleans

B. Commemorated with some type of statue

C. A master in his/her field of music

I have read several quotes where Armstrong lavished praise on Bechet and enumerated how influential he was on his playing.

So why the diss?

The tour guide actually waved as we passed. :/

I was flabbergasted.

Armstrong “told me” he didn’t want any roses, he didn’t want any posies, he just wanted to make sure I wrote this.

The reason Sidney Bechet, the world class clarinet player, who was one of the founding fathers of Jazz and one of Louis Armstrong’s biggest influences, was left out of this musical tour of New Orleans, his home town, is because he didn’t like white devil Caucasian Americans.

He, like many of his musical contemporaries, moved to Paris, where I have heard from musicians, even to today that the devil Americans are much more evil than their Parisian counterparts. With the Germans closely following the devil American Caucasians.

The devils in New Orleans pamper the Black musicians who cater to them or put devils in their combo/band and are friendly – always showing their teeth and grinning, scratching their heads and dumbing down just to be “heard” as the King of the slaves on the Marsalis Plantation put it. (Wynton)

But some musicians don’t fall for the okey doke.

These musicians will be notoriously overlooked in favor of a white musician, who cannot compare to the Black one. But because the Black musician doesn’t shuck and jive for the devil’s camera, he gets no publicity (Tubad :/ )

Image result for tubad

Image result for tubad

So cheah, I’m sending this to the tour company, In sha Allah, and The Black Press.

The Black Press won’t do anything but steal my topic and rewrite it. They should call themselves The Black Su-press. Bunch of cowards. This will be my third time but I’m not in it for the money.

That’s why it pays to have your own. Allah pays me and He is The Best of Payers. 🙂 Al Hamdulillah.

Anyway, I contributed more to the tour than I took from it. And, what I did learn was mostly bad, like the identities of people whom I know by face (and know to be coons), only to discover that they are some of the New Orleans devils’ favorite musical coons.

I was lucky enough to leave the tour right before coming upon a block of family I used to hang out with (kinda) upon my first arrival. They are definitely familiar with my animosity towards the whole tourism machine, which basically consists of devils walking, riding, cycling or driving by Blacks at play.

The only difference between us and zoo animals is that we are not in cages.

Or ARE we???

Keep Allah’s Covenant

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Beloved Sisters and Beloved Brothers!

I thought I should add a few notes, as the idea of female circumcision called (Khitaan al-Banaat in Arabic) as a GOOD THING, is most likely a completely new and foreign topic for most of you.

I first learned of the positive benefits, a few years ago, from the testimonies of women who had actually been circumcised in the proper manner and they only had positive approbations relating to the procedure and the surprisingly beneficial results.

I found an article by a female gynecologist concerning the medical benefits. (I apologize for the candor in which the doctor speaks, but medical conversation can get very detailed.)

“The secretions of the labia minora accumulate in uncircumcised women and turn rancid, so they develop an unpleasant odour which may lead to infections of the vagina or urethra. I have seen many cases of sickness caused by the lack of circumcision. 

“Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimeters when aroused, which is very annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse. 

“Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes pain. 

“Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of inflammation.  

“Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire.” 

You can read the entire article here.

I must add a note to those who may still not be convinced that since the devil has had control over the earth (6,000) years, he has turned us completely away from our nature, ISLAM, which is completely and absolutely one hundred per cent right and exact. But he is completely and absolutely opposed to ALLAH, ISLAM AND THE RIGHTEOUS, that he has made evil fair-seeming and righteousness a crime.

I realize that it may take some getting used to but personally, I am convinced, reinstating the process of female circumcision would rein in the sexual debauchery that seems to have overtaken the Blackwoman.

According to hadith, Prophet Muhammad of 1400 years ago (Peace be upon him) made a statement alluding to when “two circumcised parts come together…” And according to several articles, circumcision obligatory for men and strongly advised for women.

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum!

 

VINEGAR

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم

Image result for vinegar

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Beautiful and Beloved Asiatic Black Family!

I made some vinegar and forgot why. Well, not really because vinegar is always good. I think I was going to make some plant essences or something.

But I googled, homeopathic uses for vinegar and found this article. It has some very useful home remedies. Enjoy! VINEGAR

 

BLACK QUEEN

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Image result for black chess queen

As-Salaamu ‘Alaikum Beloved Black Sisters and Brothers!

Life ain’t nothing but a game of Chess between the Blackman and the white devil caucasians..

Guess which piece is the most powerful? THE BLACK QUEEN!

And guess who always goes first?

The Imperialistic white devils – always trying to take over the Blackman’s earth so he can enslave the people and exploit the natural resources for his own greed.

Black people don’t think like that. But we always find ourselves having to defend ourselves, our families, our homes, land and our property against these bloodthirsty beasts.

The Bible doesn’t call them the ARCHDECEIVERS for nothing.

They come in like friends. Lie and divide the original people so they can rule us. Do not be fooled. They have a lot of our people working against their own salvation.

WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON???